It’s depressing to see how Republicans are bungling the Obamacare issue. But it’s also understandable since it’s politically difficult to reduce handouts once people get hookedon the heroin of government dependency (a point I made even before Obamacare was enacted).
Unfortunately, I fear that the GOP might bungle the tax issue as well. I was interviewed the other day by Dana Loesch on this topic and highlighted several issues.
- High income tax rates on households are a big penalty on small businesses that pay through Schedule C of the personal income tax.
- Getting Republicans on the same page will be very difficult until the House GOP ditches the misguided border adjustment tax.
- Hong Kong shows that eliminating withholding would create a political environment conducive to limited government.
Here’s the full discussion.
What’s especially frustrating about this issue is that taxes should be reduced. A lot.
Brian Riedl of the Manhattan Institute debunks six tax myths. Here they are, followed by my two cents.
Myth #1: Long-term deficits are driven by tax cuts and falling revenues
Fact: They are driven entirely by rapid spending growth
Brian nails it. I made this same point earlier this year. Indeed, because the tax burden is projected to automatically increase over time, it is accurate to say that more than 100 percent of the long-run fiscal problem is caused by excessive spending (particularly poorly designed entitlement programs).
Myth #2: Democratic tax proposals would significantly reduce the deficit
Fact: Their most common proposals would raise little revenue
Once again, Brian is right. There are ways to significantly increase the tax burden in America, such as a value-added tax. But the class-warfare ideas that attract a lot of support on the left won’t raise much revenue because upper-income taxpayers have substantial control over the timing, level and composition of their income.
Myth #3: Taxing millionaires and corporations can balance the long-term budget
Fact: These taxes cannot cover Washington’s current commitments, much less new liberal wish lists
Since even the IRS has admitted that upper-income taxpayers finance a hugely disproportionate share of the federal government, it hardly seems fair to subject them to even more onerous penalties. Especially since the IRS data from the 1980ssuggest punitive rates could lead to less revenue rather than more.
Myth #4: The U.S. income tax is more regressive than other nations
Fact: It is the most progressive in the entire OECD
There are several ways to slice the data, so one can quibble with Brian’s assertion. But when comparing taxes paid by the rich compared to taxes paid by the poor, it is true that the United States relies more on upper-income taxpayers than any other developed nation. Not because we tax the rich more, but because we tax the poor less.
Myth #5: The U.S. tax code is becoming more regressive over time
Fact: It has become increasingly progressive over the past 35 years
Brian is right. Child credits, changes in the standard deduction and personal exemptions, and the EITC have combined in recent decades to take millions of households off the tax rolls. And since the U.S. thankfully does not have a value-added tax, lower-income people are largely protected from taxation.
Myth #6: Tax rates do not matter much to economic growth
Fact: They are among the most important factors
There are many factors that determine a nation’s economic success, including trade policy, regulation, monetary policy, and rule of law, so a good tax code isn’t a guarantor of prosperity and a bad tax system doesn’t automatically mean malaise. But Brian is right that taxation has a significant impact on growth.
Second, I’d ultimately like to shrink government so much that we could eliminate the income tax entirely.
Many people don’t realize that income taxes only began to plague the world about 100 years ago.
But if Republicans can’t even manage to cut taxes today, when they control both the executive and legislative branch, then neither one of my fantasies will ever become reality.