BREAKING: Kamala Harris’s brother-in-law, Tony West, has been accused of using the DOJ’s Judgment Fund to funnel billions of dollars to Democrat-supporting organizations in the NYPost.
Tony West, brother in law to Kamala Harris, oversees legal theft of BILLIONS of taxpayer dollars gifted to leftist allies by selectively settling lawsuits against the federal government starting in 2009. pic.twitter.com/mHp6WcuQ2V
— Brently𝕏 (@kopopoulous) August 25, 2024
In an op-ed published Friday by the New York Post, the writers claim that Kamala Harris’ brother-in-law Tony West may have found a whole new way to define “corrupt.” (The bio on the article states that one of the writers, Daniel Huff, “is a former counsel to the Senate and House Judiciary Committees,” while “Clark S. Judge is managing director of the White House Writers Group, Inc.”)
Tony West, who is married to Kamala Harris’s sister Maya Harris, has been at the center of controversy, particularly highlighted by posts on X and an op-ed in the New York Post.
If Kamala Harris wins the White House, her brother-in-law, Tony West, who is married to her sister Maya, is poised to claim the crooked crown.
Like Hunter, West learned his craft in the Obama years. Then head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division, he invented a new form of what 19th-early 20th centuries Tammany boss George Washington Plunkett famously called “Honest Graft.”
It was simple.
Until 1977, Congress had to approve any settlement of a civil suit against the Federal government over $100,000. This preserved the Constitutional requirement that Congress control the government’s purse. But in that year, seeking relief from the burgeoning volume of suits to review, Congress removed the cap, handing the Justice Department a permanent blank check to pay settlements unilaterally, in any amount, out of an account known as the Judgment Fund, run by the Treasury Department.
NYPost
Grok says:
- Allegations of Misuse of Taxpayer Funds: Critics, primarily on social media platforms like X, have accused Tony West of manipulating taxpayer funds while he was in charge of the Department of Justice’s Civil Division during the Obama administration.
The accusation is that he funneled billions of dollars to left-wing groups and trial lawyers through settlements and the DOJ’s Judgment Fund, which is used to pay out civil claims against the government without needing Congressional approval for each payout.- Nature of the Accusations: These allegations suggest a form of corruption where legal actions and settlements were allegedly used not just for justice or compensation but as a mechanism to direct funds towards politically aligned entities or individuals. This narrative paints a picture of legal proceedings being potentially influenced to benefit certain groups financially, thereby questioning the integrity of legal decisions made under West’s oversight.
- Public and Political Reaction: The accusations have sparked discussions, especially among conservative commentators and on platforms like X, where users have expressed outrage, comparing the situation to other high-profile cases of political corruption. However, these discussions are often within echo chambers and lack comprehensive, verified details or official investigations confirming these claims.
- Legal and Ethical Considerations: If true, these actions could be seen as exploiting legal mechanisms for political gain, raising serious ethical questions about the intersection of law, politics, and personal gain. However, it’s crucial to note that these are allegations based on interpretations of legal settlements and fund disbursements, not confirmed by legal findings or official audits up to this point.
- Allegations of Misuse of Taxpayer Funds: Critics, primarily on social media platforms like X, have accused Tony West of manipulating taxpayer funds while he was in charge of the Department of Justice’s Civil Division during the Obama administration. The accusation is that he funneled billions of dollars to left-wing groups and trial lawyers through settlements and the DOJ’s Judgment Fund, which is used to pay out civil claims against the government without needing Congressional approval for each payout.
- Nature of the Accusations: These allegations suggest a form of corruption where legal actions and settlements were allegedly used not just for justice or compensation but as a mechanism to direct funds towards politically aligned entities or individuals. This narrative paints a picture of legal proceedings being potentially influenced to benefit certain groups financially, thereby questioning the integrity of legal decisions made under West’s oversight.
- Public and Political Reaction: The accusations have sparked discussions, especially among conservative commentators and on platforms like X, where users have expressed outrage, comparing the situation to other high-profile cases of political corruption. However, these discussions are often within echo chambers and lack comprehensive, verified details or official investigations confirming these claims.