Mosquito “Flying Syringe’ is no longer a sci-fi fantasy. What could possibly go wrong?

While proponents argue for their potential benefits in controlling disease vectors, many are alarmed at the potential for disaster and depopulation through plans to genetically manipulate mosquitos.

  • Health Concerns and Disease Spread: There have been claims and concerns, especially highlighted in social media posts, suggesting that the release of genetically modified mosquitoes, partially funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, might have unintended consequences. For instance, a health emergency was declared in Brazil after a reported surge in dengue fever, which some attribute to these genetically modified mosquitoes, although direct causation isn’t conclusively proven.
  • Environmental and Biological Risks: Critics, including environmental groups and scientists, have raised alarms about the potential ecological risks of releasing these genetically modified creatures into the wild. These include fears over unforeseen impacts on local ecosystems, the possibility of creating more resilient or invasive mosquito strains, or the modified genes affecting non-target species.
  • Public Perception and Trust: The projects have stirred significant public skepticism and fear, with the possibility of these initiatives leading to new health crises, such as the re-emergence of malaria in areas where it had been previously eradicated or controlled and new illnesses deliberately dispersed.
  • Ethical and Consent Issues: Shouldn’t we have a say in all. this? There’s debate over the ethics of such large-scale biological interventions without widespread community consent or understanding. These projects seem to be bypassing proper democratic processes, with decisions being made by a few.
  • Unintended Consequences: While the goal is to reduce disease transmission, there’s a worry that these mosquitoes could adapt or that the technology might fail, leading to an increase in disease vectors or the evolution of mosquitoes that are harder to control.
  • Commercial Interests Over Public Health: Some critics view these projects as more about advancing biotech industry interests rather than focusing on public health benefits, with concerns that commercial gains might overshadow thorough risk assessments and long-term studies. You think? Always follow the money. And follow the nut job global elites who seek to depopulate the earth.
  • Lack of Transparency and Accountability: There’s criticism regarding the transparency of these projects. The full scope of experiments, their methodologies, and outcomes aren’t openly shared, which fuels conspiracy theories and mistrust.
  • Potential for Genetic Resistance: There’s a theoretical risk that if these mosquitoes mate with wild populations, it could lead to genetic resistance, where the very traits meant to reduce mosquito populations or disease transmission might become less effective over time, potentially worsening the problem.

The Gates-funded factory in Medellín, Colombia, breeds over 30 million mosquitoes weekly, which are genetically modified or infected with Wolbachia bacteria, and released across 11 countries to mate with wild mosquitoes; allegedly reducing the transmission of diseases like dengue, Zika, and yellow fever by spreading this bacteria, which inhibits the viruses’ replication.

What could go wrong?

“It’s not just the food” we have to be worried about, testified attorney Tom Renz to the Pennsylvania State Senate.

“Gates Foundation has been funding all sorts of genetic engineering of mosquitoes, and there’s a lot of talk about using mosquitoes and mosquito bites to help vaccinate certain populations.”

Aug 25, 2024 – BILL GATES GENETIC MOSQUITOES:

Bill Gates funds Oxitec a biotech company that received experimental approval to create millions of genetically modified mosquitoes in various U.S. States allowing human immunizations through mosquito bites “flying syringes.” (EEE) in Mosquitoes.