James O'Keefe

James O’Keefe exposé: “Weffers” are messing with our skies to “fix” the climate

Worldwide, citizens across continents—from North America and Europe to Asia, Australia, and Indonesia—have frequently observed and photographed persistent aerial trails that crisscross the skies, forming intricate grid patterns or spreading into broad, hazy cloud cover that lingers for hours. These visual phenomena, documented in countless citizen reports, social media posts, and dedicated online communities, have raised significant public concerns about potential large-scale atmospheric spraying. Populations, including farmers, environmental groups, and everyday observers, worry that these trails indicate deliberate release of substances for weather modification, climate intervention, or other undisclosed purposes, potentially affecting health, agriculture, and the environment. Such anxieties have spurred petitions to bodies like the European Parliament and UK government demanding transparency, manifestations against geoengineering signed by global civil society organizations, and even influenced U.S. state-level legislative efforts to address perceived aerial activities.

For years, the term “chemtrails” has been derided as a baseless conspiracy theory, with skeptics insisting that persistent white trails behind aircraft are merely contrails—harmless water vapor. However, undercover footage released by James O’Keefe from the World Economic Forum in Davos has reignited concerns, capturing climate executives openly discussing weather modification techniques that echo long-held fears of aerial spraying.In the videos, O’Keefe, disguised and posing as a representative of a fictional geoengineering firm, engages WEF attendees, (who refer to themselves as “weffers”).

One insider, Emil C. Lüth—linked to DARPA and laser communications firms—expresses enthusiasm for stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), responding “Wonderful!” when O’Keefe mentions spraying particles into the atmosphere.

Lüth hints at indirect involvement in “artificial rain” projects and notes connections to “three-letter agencies.” Another executive discusses sulfur dioxide release as a “pretty cheap way to cool down the earth,” while references to BlackRock’s backing emerge, suggesting powerful financial interests in scaling these efforts.

While not yet deployed at scale, such ideas have been studied by governments and think tanks. The candid interest from elites, including ties to DARPA and major investors, fuels suspicions that what starts as “enhancement” could expand covertly, blurring lines with chemtrail allegations of widespread, unconsented atmospheric alteration.

This footage doesn’t prove a secret global poisoning program, but it substantiates fears: weather manipulation is real, increasingly discussed at elite levels, and backed by immense resources. Transparency remains elusive.

Cloud seeding, another form of weather manipulation dismissed in chemtrail debates, is no conspiracy—it’s a documented practice since the 1940s. Programs use aircraft to disperse silver iodide or other agents to induce rainfall, operating openly in over 50 countries. The U.S. has state-funded seeding in places like California and Texas; China extensively seeds clouds for agriculture and events like the 2008 Olympics; the UAE invests heavily in rain enhancement. These involve planes leaving visible trails during operations.The Davos conversations go further, touching on geoengineering proposals like SAI—injecting reflective aerosols high in the atmosphere to combat warming, mimicking volcanic effects.