Why the 10 year lookback on Hunter’s pardon? And why it might backfire on Joe…

Leave a CommentWhy the 10 year lookback on Hunter’s pardon? And why it might backfire on Joe…Commentary

Even though he said he’d never do it…

Thanksgiving weekend must have been a doozy! White House sources are saying that Hunter told Joe he was going to publish a tell-all book because he’s broke and has nothing to lose.

Which got Dad worried. Remember, Hunter’s emails revealed that 50% of everything raised by the family goes to the Big Guy. And bear in mind that that Hunter was the Deep State proxy that helped to secure and launder all the funding for the alleged racketeering in Ukraine, including the biolab network, starting in 2014.

The Constitution grants the President broad pardon powers under Article II, Section 2, which states that the President “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.” It might be argued that since the Constitution doesn’t explicitly disallow self-pardons, it might be permissible for Joe to pardon himself.

So rather than a pardon for the drug and gun possession case Hunter just pled guilty to, which was set for sentencing this month, Joe has created a pardon with a ten-year lookback, for for all crimes Hunter might be involved in starting from Jan 1, 2014. The timing was forced by the sentencing. It is highly probable that on his way out. of the White House Joe will pardon his brother, too.

Why did he pick that date?

Because 2014 is when the CIA/State Dept took over Ukraine. 2014 is when Hunter’s biolab company, Metabiota, began looking for coronaviruses in Ukraine.

Joe is not just covering the charges. Joe is running cover for all of Hunter’s criminality in Ukraine, which is – in all probability – Joe’s criminality in Ukraine. Remember. the bragging interview where he got a top official fired? That was a real demonstration of clout.

The Fifth Amendment kicks in

Hunter’s taking the pardon spells danger for everyone implicated in his nefarious activities. He can no longer invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination to avoid testifying before Congress or grand juries now that his father has pardoned him. If those pardoned refuse to testify, they can face new charges for criminal contempt.

So, this pardon of Hunter actually opens the door to compelling him to testify about his own family, especially President Joe Biden. Since Hunter can no longer be prosecuted for actions during the period covered by the pardon, he can be compelled to testify or face imprisonment. He is a weak treacherous man and might decide to throw his father to the wolves.

However, we should note that this pardon does not extend to future criminal acts or contempt of court, as these are legally beyond the scope of the pardon’s protection. So, after utilizing the pardon to make him testify against government officials and family members, it could be argued that he should face charges for crimes not originally addressed by the pardon.

This argument would hinge on the notion that the pardon was not a valid blanket pardon because it included crimes that were not specified or known at the time of the pardon. Ultimately, such a legal challenge would likely need to be resolved by the Supreme Court.