Whistleblower Dr. Li-Meng Yan on @TuckerCarlson tonight: “Coronavirus was created in Chinese laboratory.”— Adam Baldwin (@AdamBaldwin) September 16, 2020
Whistleblower virologist Dr. Li-Meng Yan was on Tucker Carlson with shocking testimony to share about the origins of COVID-19. Indications that this might be true came when Twitter shut her down.
Li-Meng Yan, the Chinese virologist who was forced to flee the country after raising questions about the origins of the novel coronavirus, has said she will soon produce evidence to prove Covid-19 is a lab-based virus. Yan previously stated in an interview with Taiwan News that the coronavirus was developed in a Chinese military facility controlled by the People’s Liberation Army. She has been hiding in the US since leaving China, saying that she had received threats after taking her concerns to her superiors and a World Health Organization contractor researching the virus, a claim that the WHO has denied. (AS)
Whistleblower virologist Dr. Li-Meng Yan interviewed by @TheNatPulse:— Himalaya Global (@HimalayaGlobal) September 11, 2020
“The #Covid_19 was lab-modified based on a virus discovered and owned by the Chinese military, the Zhoushan bat coronavirus, ZC45 and ZXC21
My scientific report is gonna be out soon”#CCPVirus #LiMengYan pic.twitter.com/8dDqfBr2Zk
Her report can be downloaded here.
Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route
Yan, Li-Meng; Kang, Shu; Guan, Jie; Hu, Shanchang
The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has led to over 910,000 deaths worldwide and unprecedented decimation of the global economy. Despite its tremendous impact, the origin of SARS-CoV-2 has remained mysterious and controversial. The natural origin theory, although widely accepted, lacks substantial support. The alternative theory that the virus may have come from a research laboratory is, however, strictly censored on peer-reviewed scientific journals. Nonetheless, SARS-CoV-2 shows biological characteristics that are inconsistent with a naturally occurring, zoonotic virus. In this report, we describe the genomic, structural, medical, and literature evidence, which, when considered together, strongly contradicts the natural origin theory. The evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 should be a laboratory product created by using bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21 as a template and/or backbone. Building upon the evidence, we further postulate a synthetic route for SARS-CoV-2, demonstrating that the laboratory-creation of this coronavirus is convenient and can be accomplished in approximately six months. Our work emphasizes the need for an independent investigation into the relevant research laboratories. It also argues for a critical look into certain recently published data, which, albeit problematic, was used to support and claim a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2. From a public health perspective, these actions are necessary as knowledge of the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and of how the virus entered the human population are of pivotal importance in the fundamental control of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as in preventing similar, future pandemics.
Now we have to ask why? Why were seniors targeted? Is it because China can no longer support its elderly population as the One-Child Policy left no children home to look after mom and pop? Is it because seniors suck up most of health care resources? Socialized medicine everywhere is on its knees because of disease of the old. In this country, insurance companies also want seniors off their books – they would rather take in premiums from young people and not have to pay out as they age.
Or was it a gigantic power play to destabilize the world’s economy? If that was the case it’s backfiring.
The reasons behind the virus must be investigated.