Jeff Clark is a former US DOJ Double Assistant Attorney General. He’s looked at the indictment. He thinks it’s flimsy.
I'm beginning to read the indictment against Trump. But even three pages in, it's clear that the leaks that preceded the indictment are far too close to what is actually being pleaded by DOJ to be a coincidence.— Jeff Clark (@JeffClarkUS) June 9, 2023
For example, in paragraph 6a on page 3, we hear about the recording… pic.twitter.com/HP7YErumRf
IT SAYS: I’m beginning to read the indictment against Trump. But even three pages in, it’s clear that the leaks that preceded the indictment are far too close to what is actually being pleaded by DOJ to be a coincidence. For example, in paragraph 6a on page 3, we hear about the recording of the Bedminster call, which the MSNBC’s of the world have been beating a dead horse about for quite a while based on such leaks. This means that Trump lawyers could not possibly be the source of the leaks. Ergo, the leaks are coming from DOJ. They must be investigated and punished. Also, this is grounds for granting a motion highlighting jury pool poisoning and dismissing the indictment before it reaches even its one-month birthday. All of this is so outrageous; it shocks the conscience. It’s fundamentally anti-American. Trump Witch Hunt Number … what? I’ve lost count. Let’s call it Trump Witch Hunt #99. Indictment available here. Read it for yourself.
Joe has no clue
For the first time in American history, a sitting President oversaw the indictment of his top political opponent…— Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) June 9, 2023
So of course Biden runs from questions about it.
And his team immediately pushes the media out of the room.
Welcome to the banana republic. pic.twitter.com/T56wkx3gzb