Let’s look at some climate facts

HadCRUT is the dataset of worldwide monthly instrumental temperature records formed by combining the sea surface temperature records compiled by the Hadley Centre of the UK Met Office and the land surface air temperature records compiled by the Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia. “HadCRUT” stands for Hadley Centre/Climatic Research Unit Temperature

The data tends to manipulated. Remember, all climate “science” is based on datamodeling, not real-world effects. To get the results they seek for political purposes and funding the raw data gets massaged to come up with the desired outcome: climate chaos. Carbon dioxide is usually blamed. So Andy May has looked at the warming data – with and without – CO2 levels.

I hate statistics, as many of you know. Some people think statistics and/or statistical models that meet standard statistical criteria are facts. The IPCC can be like that. They statistically model global surface temperatures with models of volcanic and anthropogenic forcing and compare the model to one with only volcanic forcing. Then they turn to us, with a straight face, and say the comparison shows anthropogenic forcing is driving all the warming. What about solar? Oh, they considered that they say, the Sun makes no difference, see their chart in figure 1 from AR6. Solar is assumed to be zero and volcanism is small, thus the model assumes all recent warming is due to humans, then draws the same conclusion in a perfect example of circular reasoning. But what if the solar forcing is not zero? What difference does that make? 

More at the link to the best climate blog on the internet below:

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/11/16/modeling-hadcrut5-with-co2-and-without-co2

And ask yourself, can you name one catastrophic climate prediction that has ever come true?

Don’t forget seas surface temperatures