Yesterday we looked at urban heat islands and their effect on climate data. Today we look at the mechanism that’s driving the climate cult movement: modeling.
As Andrew Montford says in this thread:
Climate models are *really* big. Millions of lines of code attempting to reproduce the physics of a highly complex system, creating an artificial world, its surface divided into cells of up to 100 km × 100 km in size, multiple layers of atmosphere above, and ocean below.
Let’s examine why they are useless.
The argument that global warming is a serious problem rests on the output of climate models, vast computer simulations of the atmosphere, the oceans and the biosphere. But are climate models good enough to inform policymakers? This thread argues they are not. Not even close. 🧵 pic.twitter.com/roMgNuZfLd
— Andrew Montford (@aDissentient) July 26, 2023
More interesting reads.
https://www.hoover.org/research/flawed-climate-models
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/the-great-failure-of-the-climate-models
