Scientist debunks liberal ‘cow fart’ claims

Photo credit: Pixabay, Couleur,, CC by 0.0, Public Domain

Environmentalist claims that beef and dairy cattle are causing the planet to overheat, which are part of a larger U.N.-led plan to outlaw Americans’ access to food, have been scientifically debunked.

“(T)here is no scientific evidence, whatsoever, that domestic livestock could represent a risk for the Earth’s climate,” Dr. Albert Glatzle concludes in a new scientific paper, Climate Change Dispatch reports.

The “warming potential of anthropogenic GHG [greenhouse gas] emissions has been exaggerated,” Glatzle finds.

“(T)he beneficial impacts of manmade CO2 emissions for nature, agriculture, and global food security have been systematically suppressed, ignored, or at least downplayed by the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) and other UN (United Nations) agencies,” Dr. Glatzle adds.

Dr. Glatzle has authored two textbooks and over 100 research papers, Climate Change Dispatch notes.

The effort to eliminate farming and ranching, part of the U.N.’s Agenda 21 and a centerpiece of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s “Green New Deal,” hinge on the claim “cow farts” are trapping solar energy and turning the planet into a greenhouse.

Under Agenda 21, the parts of the United States where most farming and ranching currently occurs would be “rewilded,” as residents are relocated to coastal “supercities” and the interior of the United States placed off-limits to human activity to act as a “wildlife corridor.”

False claims of “global warming,” driven by “cow farts,” are the Trojan horse by which liberals hope to deliver Agenda 21’s goals.

“What we’ve got to do in energy conservation is try to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, to have approached global warming as if it is real means energy conservation, so we will be doing the right thing anyway in terms of economic policy and environmental policy,” former U.S. Senator Tim Wirth (D-CO) once admitted.

The elimination of ranching and the reduction of Americans’ access to food also accomplishes the liberal goal of “de-developing” the U.S. economy, which liberals feel is unfair to other countries because capitalism works.

“Attempts to increase food production further will tend to accelerate the deterioration of our environment,” wrote Obama administration “Science Czar” John Holdren in his book “Human Ecology.”

“A massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality environ­ment in North America and to de-develop the United States. De-development means bringing our economic system (especially patterns of consumption) into line with the realities of ecology and the global resource situation. Resources and energy must be diverted from frivolous and wasteful uses in overdevel­oped countries to filling the genuine needs of underdeveloped countries,” Holdren adds.

Other major environmentalist leaders agree with this statement of global socialism.

“The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States: We can’t let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the U.S. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are. And it is important to the rest of the world to make sure that they don’t suffer economically by virtue of our stopping them,” said Michael Oppenheimer of the Environmental Defense Fund.