Will Scharf that makes some interesting points that are not being picked up by the media. Scharf is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney who worked on two Supreme Court confirmations and clerked for two federal appellate judges. He’s also running for Missouri Attorney General. Like many, he thinks the prosecution against the former president is “outrageous.”
Click on where it says ‘more’ in the Tweet and it will take you to Twitter – you don’t have to have signed up to read it.
I am a former Assistant U.S. Attorney, worked on two Supreme Court confirmations, and clerked for two federal appellate judges.
— Will Scharf (@willscharf) June 15, 2023
The indictment and case against President Trump is outrageous and shocking.
But let’s get into the details.
Here are my 6 key points on the case:
(1) Interplay between the Espionage Act and the Presidential Records Act
— Will Scharf (@willscharf) June 15, 2023
A lot of my friends have spoken insightfully about the scope of the Presidential Records Act. I’d direct you to Mike Davis’s (@mrddmia) commentary on the subject, and also Michael Bekesha of…
(2) Classification and National Defense Information
— Will Scharf (@willscharf) June 15, 2023
I want to reiterate this point because it’s really important:
Just because something is classified—even Top Secret, SCI, NOFORN, FISA, pick your alphabet soup—does not mean that it is National Defense Information (NDI) within…
(3) Walt Nauta and DOJ Misconduct
— Will Scharf (@willscharf) June 15, 2023
Far and away the most troubling side story to emerge from this saga so far are the allegations made by Trump aide and co-defendant Walt Nauta’s lawyer last week.
You may have missed it if you blinked. Not surprisingly, the mainstream media has…
(4) Attorney Client Privilege
— Will Scharf (@willscharf) June 15, 2023
The indictment relies on a significant amount of information received, in one form or another, from one of Trump’s lawyers, Evan Corcoran, who was compelled to testify in front of the grand jury. According to news reports, the argument for breaching…
(6) Jack Smith: Why him?
— Will Scharf (@willscharf) June 15, 2023
If you could pick any lawyer in the country to handle a controversial case against a former president, a case involving an aggressive, unprecedented use of the Espionage Act, a controversial law in and of itself, what lawyer would you pick?
You’d…
Or click here to read it all.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1669333151569543168.html
